Adobe plans to expand Flash to TVs and set-top boxes. No information on timing was giving in the article. This seems quite natural to me in terms of interface, but I have to agree with MS on the matter of Flash’s limit video delivery capabilities. People expect to watch HD content on their HD TVs. Non-HD content on an HD TV looks like crap. I imagine none of this is lost on Adobe, so it should be interesting to see what they come up with. As for MS Silverlight, I did watch the extended Olympic coverage using the Silverlight and yay … but it wasn’t HD either, so I had to watch the video in a small window on my TV to see things clearly. That kinda defeats the point of have a ~50-inch screen. The other interesting part of this discussion is that Apple has yet to adopt Flash. It makes me wonder whether they have something up their sleeve or whether they are being the same old obnoxious Apple that has some philosophical objection to Flash. Either way it seems that Apple’s complaint that Flash is too processor intensive is a call to action since I imagine that concern would cross over into TV’s and set-top boxes too.
Here’s a link to an article/commentary about it.
Here’s a link to the article. I have a netbook with Window’s XP, but I’m not beholden to XP. I can’t install anything like Office on my netbook because it’s too much of a resource hog and required installation from a DVD drive. However the basic version of MS Office that comes with the laptop is fine for the things I do on it.
What I do need with respect to my netbook is the ability to get on the Internet and to view whatever parts of the Internet I desire. On my iPhone my current limitation is Flash — but that more of a problem with Adobe than anyone else. My feeling is as long as the browser works well, I’m golden since I will most likely used web-based software because a netbook doesn’t have much on board storage.
However, it’s important to keep in mind that netbooks will be treated as the lowest-end computer. I did witness over the holidays, many financially pinched people considering a netbook as their first PC purchase or as a replacement for an ancient computer that was too old to allow access to the Internet. When I think about this user, I really don’t know what’s best. They may be used to “ancient versions” of software or they may be computer illiterate. This tends to make me think, the simpler the better. But when I consider which is easier to use, my PC or my iPhone, I would have to say they are about the same since the iPhone mimics a PC experience. In other words, to successfully use most mobile devices beyond basic dialing phone numbers, there is an expectation of computer literacy. Thinking in this vein, does the OS matter? No, just as long as there’s a big clear “Internet” button, links to do basic things like calendars and view images, and the presentation is professional. This is most important because I think past attempts at Internet appliances failed because the interface design “looked down” on potential customers (the young, the elderly, and the computer illiterate). It has to look like a real PC and it has to function like a real PC.
For the more savvy user, I think speed is the key. If Android turns out to be the speedier OS that allows similar functionality and software selection to PC and smartphones, then I think Android will be a winner. I hope, though, that Microsoft isn’t resting on its laurels and are, instead, working dilligently on a Windows-lite for netbooks. It’ll be a tough fight once the cell phone makers enter the fray. However, this competition will be good for everyone because it will force innovation. I’m looking forward to it.
Microsoft continues on, consumed with Google envy (I really don’t get it, so I will continue to stand on the sideline and laugh my behind off). Search rebates is the latest scheme they are trying in the hopes of disrupting Google. Continue reading Microsoft’s Search Rebates