Finally, an a car navigation system that I might consider using.  The “Dash Express” link cars together over wireless and cellular networks to provide real traffic condition information.  It sounds like only a few cars with the device are needed to provide traffic data, though, I imagine the more cars on the network the better.  I wonder, though, can they get enough users to make this viable and I wonder why they didn’t license the technology to companies such as Garmin that already have a stong present in mobile GPS.  It would be much easier for me to part with $400 for something I know other people will eventually buy than to take a chance on a start-up company that is challenging a fortified hill.  There’s a video embedded in the article, so here’s a link back to the orginal article.

Some of this this is a little surprising given how male focused technology is typically thought of being.  As I’ve worked with the ICS Web 2.0 team, lately I’ve come to question my perception of women and technology, in particular “Mom.”  Quite often we think that something has to be so easy a “Mom” can use it.  However, “Mom” is not what she used to be.  Moms are college educated, they may still work or used to work in offices with PC’s and what not, and Moms are at home using technology and integrating technology into their lifestyle.  It totally makes sense that Moms with young children would have to time shift in order to watch the programming they want because tots dominate the TV during their waking hours.  It totally makes sense that women participate more in social networking activities — it’s just another way to, or, extentions of existing ways to maintain connections that have always been present.  Duh!  When you think about it.  Yet, I would say the perception that women are not as tech savvy as men persists.  I challenge myself and others to think differently and to really consider these “Duh!” situations in which technology seamlessly fits into women’s lifestyles, rather than coming at if from the perspective of “dumbing down” or “pinking” technology for women.

Females Lead In Use Of Certain Tech: Survey

Quite honestly, I’m not sure if I get this cheap, wimpy notebook push.
1.  A computer needs some oomph to have a good Internet experience.
2.  I question whether a PC is a priority in a “developing” nation.  It sounds altruistic and utopian, but what’s the practicality of it?
3.  Developing nations and Asia are bypassing PCs for mobiles because a mobile infrastructure is easier and cheaper to deploy and because mobiles fit better in their lifestyles.
4.  Why would I want a crappy little computer as a secondary when I can get a nice mobile for about the same price? 

Like one of the commentors to this article, I also paused a bit when they said this computer will use SSD harddrive — at $300 ???  Maybe a few years on down the road.

Eitherway, I see that these cheap laptops are a very “US” way of thinking.  I really don’t get it.  Besides, I and any school or developing nation can build a decent barebones computer for ~$300.

Somebody please explain this to me …

I’m still trying to understand the mini-notebook PC.  I see today on CNET that we are expected to annouce our own mini-notobook any day. It isn’t clear from this article what the HP product is so I did some digging to understand.  First of all, I seriously doubt this PC will ship any day now with a 64GB SSD drive.  Checking current hard drive prices, I see that these drives retail for over $1000.  However, it appears that drives that are 16GB and below may be consistent with a $499 PC.

The obvious question that comes to mind for me is why would I buy this over ~$500 notebook with a 12-in screen.  Yes, at 8.9-in the mini-note is small, however how easy is it to type on and how useful is the monitor?  I see the target audience is traveling business people and school children.  Now, looking at other mini-notebook from Sony and Fujitsu, I see that their strategy is to pack a lot of computing power into a small package.  Sony’s starting price is $1899 (11.1-in) and Fujitsu’s starting price is $999 (5.6-in) and $1749 (8.9-in).   Sony seems to be focused on weight, thickness, and style (they look like are aimed at people who want to appear to be fashionable and unburdened by their PC — sorta like a clutch purse.) and Fujitsu’s are distinguished by touchscreens (they look quite utilitarian to me).  And then there’s the Apple airbook with its thin Appley-Appleness starting at $1799.

Taking into account matters of practicality for school children — you want to indoctrinate them into the prevailing OS and software (which currently is Windows), you want them to have rich Internet experience, and you want the computer to be powerful enough to last a few years — so I don’t see an advantage of having a small screen and hardware that is barely good enough for now at a comparable cost to a base model 12-in notebook.  Get the $499 full sized laptop.  As for business people — if all you really need is a PDA, then get a PDA or a smartphone.  As for a laptop, I think the issues of fat fingers and poor eyesight are universal, so I don’t really understand the need for laptop smaller than the one Sony is offering.  It seems to me, like in that past, engineers and marketing folks might be more intrigued by the idea of a small computer rather than considering the practically of it — in other words a product in search of a customer.  The space this kind of product would fill seems to be encroached upon from both sides by PDA’s and smart phones and low-end fullsized notebooks.  I guess, my feeling is that there is a limit to the size at which a laptop screen is no longer usable.  For me that is around 10-in.  As a traveller, I’m not so much concerned about the width of screen, so much as the weight and thickness of the devise.  This will become more important as the airlines get desparate and start charging separately to transport luggage.  In this sense, I think that Apple and Sony are on the right track by concentrating on weight and thickness and then adding style cues for style concious young folk with money.  At the same time I do like the rugged aluminum case and the spill-proof keyboard of the HP model.

Well, enough of my rambling.  Here’s the CNET write up.